Robert Hammond, a Cambridge mortgage adviser, paid his wife’s life insurance policy before strangling her.

0
33

Husband Murdered Wife to Benefit from Life insurance Payout, Court Hears

A shocking case of greed and deception unfolded in a UK court as a man was accused of murdering his wife to cash in on her Life insurance policy. The court heard that Andrew Hammond, 45, allegedly killed his wife Sian Hammond, 44, in order to benefit financially from her death.

The prosecution detailed how Hammond had been in contact with a debt recovery agent from Legal & General, the same company that held his wife’s Life insurance policy, just days after Sian’s death. He reportedly inquired about the possibility of paying off his debts quicker using the Life insurance payout he was expecting. Prosecutor Mr. Paxton told the court that Hammond’s focus was on the financial gain he could obtain from his wife’s death, even as she had been dead for barely a week.

The court also heard that Hammond had paid his wife’s Life insurance policy up to date just days before her death, with the policy set to pay out £450,000 in the event of her passing. Hammond allegedly made a call to the debt recovery agent the day after his wife’s murder, hinting that something may have changed by then.

Detective Inspector Richard Stott described the case as unusual, as suspicions were not raised until a post-mortem examination revealed concerning injuries that led to the conclusion that Sian had died from compression of the neck. Hammond’s fitness watch showed a spike in activity around the time of Sian’s death, coinciding with their children being away.

The prosecution painted a picture of Hammond as a competent liar who was under significant financial pressure and had resorted to extreme measures to maintain his public standing and hide his debts. Hammond’s alleged greed and fear of losing his reputation were cited as motives for the murder.

Sian’s family described her as one of the friendliest people, and her tragic death has left a void in the lives of many. The court heard that Hammond and Sian had spent the day together before her murder, with no evidence of any third party involvement in her death.

Hammond was arrested for murder, but he maintained his innocence, claiming he had not harmed his wife. However, evidence presented in court suggested otherwise, with Hammond admitting to being a skilled liar who had used false claims of cancer and divorce to delay debt repayments.

A forensic pathologist testified that Sian’s injuries were consistent with a struggle, further implicating Hammond in her death. The trial continues as the court seeks to uncover the truth behind this tragic and senseless crime.